Those
familiar with my online writing know that I began writing a fairly
common media/net blog and in time gravitated to the questions of
technologies impact on societies and people. After several years I
came up with a model that seemed to generate data that matched that
of the real world.
However true
this may have been I realize now that all my efforts were struck
superfluous because of a fatal flaw. Being convinced of my own
intellectual superiority I did not give a damn whether anyone read
the stuff, or understood it.
Incomprehensibility seemed to be not my
problem. But now, after starving and going cold and hungry more times
then I care to remember I've changed my ways. Oh I still don't care
whether you understand this – but it is now of vital importance
that you pay me large sums of money.
Getting back to the show..
Technology empowered
a few in the beginning and the rest, to a lesser extent, over the
long run.
What I probably
did not stress enough was the notion that when natural processes are
confronted with technological pressures there is often a complete
breakdown of the original, organic, system. A good example of this is
the origin of the great American dust bowl in the nineteen thirties.
It had been for
millennia the great American Prairie, a place where a top soil a few
inches think held together enough moisture to feed first the Buffalo
for the Indians and then the cattle drives for the cowboys. In the
twenties it was converted to “Quick wheat” farm as and by the
thirties it was the home of some of the most nightmarish dust storms
ever to hit the planet.
It is not
only plants that do not respond to over utilization, humans do not as
well. A good example of this is the British industrial revolution
where overcrowding, overwork and poor sanitary conditions lead to
epidemic diseases.
In the
Capitalist model this doesn’t happen because the workers, faced
with the negative stimuli of death and suffering, would move out –
this, of course begs the question when it is the employers best
interest to see to it that such a thing never happens.
In other words while in
the ideal the worker sits down and rationally decides whether to
work in place A or Place B, in the real world his choices are
somewhat more limited.
In socialism the
case is not much different. There instead of capital being the
determinant it is the central committee what is essential is that in
neither case is it the worker. The worker rather serves circumstance
and opportunity, which in turn are factored by technology.
And another way to
look at market determination is to disregard both the capitalist
and the central committee and consider a wider context. Not ever
capitalist is a heartless exploiter and there are those who would
wish away hard times, but it cannot be done.
To place this in
terms of a cruel joke the fat and ugly girl rarely gets a date
despite her abilities as a cook and sense of humor, where as the
pretty girl does regardless of her social flaws.
Now to the subject
of todays missive. In Salem Massachusetts, in the seventeenth
century, under the gavel of judge Hathorne, Nathanial Hawthornes
grandfather, several people of various age and sex were burned alive
at the stake for the crime of witchcraft. The laws mandating the use
of this punishment were explicit and long standing and had been
around for hundreds of years. In other parts of the colonies the
use of hexes, spells, and incantations were recognized as criminal
punishable offenses and could lead to time in the goal.
The reason why this
happened has been debated many times. Some claim the cause was
organic, a form of ergot on rye bread – nonsense – it has never
occurred again. Others like to suggest s degree of sexual
frustration. Again, why then? Besides which, the Puritans were pure
in some ways but fairly liberal in their sexual relations. It was
considered the norm for instance for a couple to sleep together prior
to marriage to see if their sexual attraction was mutual.
Realizing the
burning at the stake is now rare, we may seek an equally rare cause.
My study of criminal justice has led me to the believe that our use
of punishment is a dark vestigial holdover from and equally dark and
unenlightened era. The use for lynching for instance had much more
symbolic use then practical. It was mean to “scare the blue devils
away.”
In truth much
of what masquerades as justice is superstition meant to say to the
devil “We don’t like you.”
(Suffice to say as to
whether the devil actually hears I will leave to the theologians to
decide.)
Sometime
justice is just vengeance given an acceptable outlet. Sometimes,
whether fair or not we fight to preserve a good thing. On a larger
scale we beg of God to intercede for us and to help us. We pay God
via sacrifice, usually someone elses.
The Salem
story is simple when understood.
English history
goes like this. There’s the dark ages which end in the coming of
cities and William the Conqueror, then comes the plague which wipes
out a sizable portion of the population , then comes a period of a
labor shortage when peasants could in effect, name their salaries,
then came the central state when gradually year by year the
government took back wealth via taxes and such.
The Puritans choose
this time to go to America where land was cheap and food was
plentiful and there were no king’s men making sport with the
daughters. All was good for awhile, until the secular humanists of
the day decided they wanted in on the action. The Puritans lived
inland, farmed, and spent all day Sunday in prayer. The new comers
drank and sang songs and worst of all danced in public! Even worse
then that it became obvious that here were a lot of newcomers, a
seemingly endless supply.
And what if
the Germans should hear of the new Paradise? Even worse the
Italians (who everyone knew breed like mice?) And why had God, who
had a special place in his heart for White anglosaxon protestants
turn his back on his chosen people?
There could be
only one answer. Remember these folks were not worldly – they
considered worldliness a sin, a crime, the road to hell even. The
answer had to be that their society had been betrayed by witchcraft.
Yes the purveyors of evil were among the flock and as we would burn
away a cancer so it was decided to burn away the cancer of
demonology.
The real tragedy
and the one that continues to this day is the so called witches
bought into the argument. I don’t want to hurt any ones feeling or
insult anyone’s god but there is no devil –hence no effective witch
craft. The issue has been settled.
I am tired. I
am tired both literally and figuratively. Once again though we must
state that courage is of vital import if one is to survive in these
ignorant and superstition ridden times.
The
people who died did so because the fear of being alone was greater
then the fear of death. C’mon let’s give death it’s due. Some
say it’s not the worst thing that could happen. But it’s bad
enough.
Yet, in the final analysis it was a economic thing, you see. and like most attempts to influence the gods of commerce it was an excessive in futility
Uh we like think ourselves civilized but game of life knows no such rules . You are savages, as likely to exterminate a whole race or religion as to light a candle.
It's all a matter of pushing the right button.
a
a