Like many of us, winter time
provides me an excuse to curl up with a book and let the world go by.
The feeling of the last few years in the publishing industry is that
fantasy lit is no longer genre, it is now fiction but after spending
ten years in the mother lode of the UK I have lost my taste for it.
There's Tolkien and that's about it.
I picked up a copy of the
Complete Grimms Folk tales the other day and must confess that I now
read it in a new and comprehensive way. Folk tales are not so much
didactic in the sense that they instruct us how to live, as they are
logical. Bottom line – they make sense and their ultimate goal is
to lead us from childhood to maturity. Anthropologically speaking
the tales come across as case studies.
Also I tried ordinary adult
fiction, which is mostly crime and mystery stories. The formula is
recognizable right off the bat. Even Ludlam and Le Carre', both of
whom I've read and enjoyed extensively, tend to stay in the same
world for each novel.
Incidentally I tried
Caleb Carr's new fantasy and was disappointed. He seems to be trying
to emulate the dungeons and dragons books of Weiss and Hickman, but
he doesn't have the gift for it.
And he's a fine writer as evidenced by
his earlier novels. Without some sort of a moral message a book is
just words. (The Message of the D&D books incidentally is that
technology and magic are virtually indistinguishable.)
What I can read, if it's
done well, is historical fiction. Victor Hugo's Hunchback of Notre
Dame is unfortunately known to most only for it's story of the
doomed love triangle of the beauty, the handsome hero and the beast,
but the actual novel goes in to great detail about 16th
Century Paris that add immeasurably to the impact of the story.
So I'm reading “The Silver
Eagle” by Ben Kane and so far so good. What contextualizes the
entire story is it is about a legion on the frontier that for
various reasons, has not played a large role in the scheming that
went on between Julius Caesar and his rivals.Apparently it's part of a series of books about the lost legion - an imaginary legion that wanders about, keeping true to the codes of the vanished republic.
It triggered something.
For many years I've tried to
come up with a phrase that would describe the people that grew up in
the time and place I did. Twain invented “The Gilded Age.”
Hemingway came up with “The Lost Generation.” In order for
this to work, of course, others have to see the point.
What is more there has to
be an opposition- a cadre of people who are vehemently and violently
opposed to my interpretation. There were people who thought the long
cycles of boom and bust that Twain called the gilded age were great
and so the other name for the era is “The Gay Nineties”
Likewise the era after the first world war, when mankind began to
realize that he was part of a huge killing machine and that the
killing machine was totally indifferent to it's victims brought
about what we could at the very least call a vast disassociation.
The empires fought to
preserve their status but it was no longer needed to cloak their
ambitions in religious or moral garments.
As Claude Rains was to say thirty year
later in Casablanca “Shocking, simply shocking”
The phrase “The
gilded age” was to receive new life ten or so years after it was
coined.
Two enterprising Broadway songwriters
wrote “Only a bird in a gilded cage.” Which was about the sad
condition of the beautiful young woman we know today as the trophy
wife. The eighteen nineties mirrored the nineteen eighties closely.
The yuppies of the day lived fast, dressed well and spent most of
their time in the effort to impress a big shot.
The lost generation (1920-1940) were so
because it finally hit them; the first world war demonstrated that
there was no rhyme nor reason to nationalistic politics other then
“get the money up front.” The most concise explanation anyone
ever came up with was to say of the leaders “they had to do
something because they were afraid to be seen as doing nothing.”
I'm not sure I can
even hold that against them. I'll let you in on a little secret, one
gained by yours truly at no small cost. Remember I have some
experience in this writing game. The secret is when sanity fails then
try a little madness. When truth falls sloppy dead then try
coincidence, because here's another secret. The guy next to you is no
smarter then you are. They're bluffing - just like you. Truth is
whatever you can get away with. An authoritative tone of voice, good
posture and a clean suit goes a long way towards winning any
argument.
It might help, as
well, to consider the greek idea of the daemon. It is that confidence
that enables one to stroll forth into the lions den confident in the
awareness that the lion is just an overweight pussy cat. Where does
it come from? Who knows? It can come from madness and megalomania, as
in the case of dictators, or, as Freud suggested, it can come from a
loving mother.
Without it we are not even
in chaos. We are simply lost. We are defined by our opposition.
Remove the opposition and there's, as
the expression goes, “hell to pay”
As I said, much of the most
interesting stuff by Hugo is edited out of the abridged editions of
his works. If and when you read what I am about to say, or hear of
it somehow, I have little doubt that the first few paragraphs here
will be tossed aside. Well, don't blame me! I tried. I really did.
Hemingway’s lost generation,
between the big wars, seemed to be having a lot of fun but
nevertheless for the average people, suffice to say it was business
as usual. The poor got shafted and the rich got richer. It was the
roaring twenties after all. Do the Charleston! Do the Black
Bottom! Shake that black bottom for me Mamma!
The fact of the matter is
that soon artistic hegemony would shift from east to west over the
waters. A salient moment was “The King of Jazz”, an early color
film staring Paul Whiteman and Bing Crosby. It was by no means
jazz, but like the confidence man it suggested it was and the
Europeans had lost enough faith to believe it.
It's easy to say that American culture is an oxymoron, like military intelligence. The
great American art form however is not Jazz – it is advertising,
which can be defined as “the art of telling people what to do.”
Finally then we come to my
bid for immortality. We are not the lost generation. We are the
generation that seeks escape from being found. Being found means
being controlled. The art of telling people what to do has come
round to it's eventual origin – the art of telling people when to
die.
Reagan, of course, was the
AntiChrist. No one can argue with that. And to see through the devils
whiles we must first of all forgive him. He who hated his father. He
who hated his children. They must firstly be forgiven for it is not
them to blame but circumstances.
Before we can forgive the
devil we must see the greatness in him. We must face the fact that
his promises were not lies – not in the true sense of lies. He,
like the devil, delivered what he promised. As to the side effects,
the destruction of the American way of life, well that's another
story.
So, for his generation, or many
in his generation who were old people between 1980 and 2010 you won
– you won the lottery big time. Taxes were slashed and
entitlements expanded. We know this. It is not rocket science, and
as well the questions as to what to do now are not going to go away.
But I ask you to take a moment and consider not the future, which is
unknown, nor the past, which is subject to interpretation, but the
recent past.
It is a curious
(read, “malevolent”) fact that pure hatred is not the best way
to do harm to those we would destroy. As Frank Herbert said, “To
make something stronger, attack it.” Overt hatred alerts our
allies. More to the point it alerts us that we are threatened and
must take counter measures.
True evil is far too wise to allow this
to happen. It shakes our hand as we enter the house of death. It
commiserates with us as we sadly explain our state. It would like
to help us, but it has a better idea – it will allow us to help
ourselves!
So I consider that
legion of roman soldiers wandering around the empire. Many of the
members are well trained. The thing is to consider that when the
Gilded age came to an end it was done by Teddy Roosevelt, who was not
a businessman, and not a politician. He was a law man. Any man with
sufficient resources can, as the Romans would say , “hire Greek
Brains” to do their publicity work. What was needed was to see
the opposition not as businessmen, but as criminals, and there was
and remains a strong desire in us not to do so.
What the criminal
values above all is loyalty to himself. The problem with capable
people is that they do not become capable by being loyal to petty
tyrants. So what is to be done with them?
They must be cast
aside. Recall a good percentage of why Napoleon was so successful
against central European armies at first is not only that his armies
were good, but that the opposition was terrible, and especially
terribly led – primarily by people who gained their commissions via
bribes
In order to give strength
to my definition I have to limit it. I am talking about the
generation that came of age between 1970 and 2000 - yup the baby
boomers. At the same time they were at the front of every advertising
campaign – the heart – the actual people – was lost. They
were and are the Forgotten generation. Nixon's cannon fodder.
The lost generation was
bewildered. The Forgotten generation was, some would say,
intentionally befuddled. Whatever the case, whether abdication or
coup, for a comparatively small amount of silver they have
squandered their birthright and handed their futures over to others
who have little interest in the good of all.
It is odd. Like it or not we have
moved on and what is done is done. A great deal of writing gives
hints of portentous events just around the corner but in this case
the die is cast.
It is agony to watch one's
future slip away. I won't kid you. I saw it happen, or felt that was
so. The long days and nights in the wasteland. “Get a life”
shouts the clown. “ha ha I'm dying”- the teardrop explodes
“good for you, good for you. Good for you,” says the broken doll.
The mere mention of the
phrase “Forgotten Generation” however does not in an of itself
give you reason to care about, or consider the ramifications. One of
the better ways to do that is to consider an example from what I call
“intermediate zen.”
Zen is well known as a
primarily wordless method of enlightenment. Masters look askance at
so called zen cook books. If such pronouncements are paths to
omniscience then what is poetry? Nevertheless if it is your
calling to write pooetry then by all means – write away!
Another paradox is
the term “mystic”. The word itself sounds like mist and the
practitioners often surround themselves with obscurities while the
goal is always to attain that clarity of mind that allows for true
perception of reality.
The danger and
difficulty of the above two misunderstandings is that they attempt to
apply a qualitative analysis to something that resists it. To apply a
quantitative analysis is also impossible – (How do I love thee? Let
me count the ways.) - but at least with a quantitative description
the absurdity is more obvious.
Right, well,
lets's jump to it. The Lost Generation and the forgotton generation
are two diffirent things. There's a teleoplogical aspect at play
here – meaning where ddo the terms com from and where are they
going. To use our old friends I'll give the example of the void and
nothing.
Nothing is that which once
had thingness” whereas the void never did. In that sense the
“nothing can be traversed, reverse engineered while the void,
never having descended to form, cannot. At the risk of sounding
absurd nothing therefore can be understood whereas the void cannot.
In the same way confusion can theoretically be straightened out
whereas chaos cannot. If it can changed to order then it is not chaos
in the first place. One might suggest that the difference between
the two states of reality is the presence of a foothold in both
confusion and the “not thing”.
Nevertheless the two,
like being lost and being forgotten are in daily life, similar.
The first world war was not
the first to kill tens of thousands of soldiers a day, but it was the
first to allow the killing to be done, aided by technology, by a
handful of men. This had to raise questions in mens minds as to
whether it was actually a determinant of correct rectitude, or the
will of God. The early novels of Aldous Huxley bring out , for the
first time, the sense of uselessness in the individuals confrontation
with organized society. His world presented a different outcome from
that of H.G. Wells.
Wells was famous for his deus ex
machina – the hand of God that appeared at the last moment to save
the day. Huxley had no such illusions.
My use of the term
“forgotten generation” for the upper middle class between 1970
and 2010 is not perfect but it has several justifications, which I
will describe.
Although I am an
American the era and effects happened across much of the
industrialized world. Beginning with the revolutions and slogans of
the seventies – the cohorts marched in similar ways, through
indifference, to the neo-conservatism of the 80's and 90's and
finally to the economic collapses of the end of the era. What I
describe then, like the economic world had transcended borders.
This era also coincided,
roughly with my adult working life. I was born in the tail end of the
baby boom and hence got little benefit from it. It was sort of like
knowing a woman who was free with her favors and courting her for
awhile only to discover that she had repented of her previous ways
and was now saving herself for Mr Right.
As well there is no
denying a generational role' in what transpired. Much of America
lived on credit cards for decades and when the bill came due – it
was someone elses problem. The same held true with the welfare states
of southern europe.
In the nineteen
twenties, prior to the depression of the thirties there were plenty
of indicators that all was not well in Happyland. Even in the
isolated sinecures of Wall Street there were plenty of people who
were able to avoid the disaster by getting out in time. This
situation replicated itself almost exactly in the first decade of
the twenty first century. Call it a propensity to gamble if you
like. More cynically one would have to suggest that it was
necessary to perpetuate the myth that the Stock Market was
functioning as it was intended to do and was not a criminal
enterprise. That too remains with us today.
There's a
question theologians have asked for thousands of years. When the
Israelites
were freed they went back to Israel, a
walk, even with women and children that ordinarily would take a few
weeks at most. It took them forty years.
Little explanation is
given and so the theologians suggest the reason for the long walk was
that after their sojourn in Egypt the Jews had lost the ways of
freedom – they had become used to letting others do their thinking
for them and they to learn to think for themselves before they could
return to the promised land.
God was aiding them even
as it appeared he was holding them back.
In our story however
there remains a critical difference between the lost and the
forgotten. The Lost generation after the first world war knew not
where to go. Their Gods had been broken on the altars. They split
apart. Prohibition was righteous allegedly , yet it led to
gangsterism. The Stock market led to the depression.
There is wide consensus
that the great flaw of America is racism, and yet one wonders if
not in a nation of so diverse a population there is not an ongoing
desire to find and identify the low man on the totem pole. Like in
professional boxing where one can trace the history of immigration
from Germans to Irish, to Italians and finally to blacks who were
effectively place out of order due to racism.
The myth is that the
market system finds the most capable people and rewards them. Is it
not possible that it also finds the weakest and exploits them? We
know how that's done. We simply look at those we wish to disappear
and we look right through them!
The problem of course is that at
the end of the day they are still with us – waiting patiently.
It makes us feel
uncomfortable, but not uncomfortable enough to do anything about it
As the case may be at some
point however we have to take responsibility for circumstances as we
allow them to be, and indeed , as we create them. The explanation
that one was “just lucky” begins to wear thin after awhile.
One of the major problems
that faces us today is the assignation of blame, or responsibility.
It extents from the concentration camp keepers who were “just
following orders” to the corporate lawyer that seeks to minimize
culpability for the malevolent actions of his firm.
And in truth, should we
reach even further beyond the mere legal contingencies that govern
financial and social interactions and travel to those myths and
preconceptions upon which life rests we must facr the daunting truth
that Mickey Mouse, a creation loved far beyond that of any organic
creature is not a living entity. The Mouse is a false god and those
that die for it die for nothing.
It seems a trivial distinction
yet it is a question that cannot be permanently solved for the simple
matter that the false god, like the devil, pays us and the children
of the real deity are a burden.
I for one have never
consciously shirked or shied away from admitting this terrible truth
– which is that doing good does not make sense. Logically it is
the murderer, the rapist and the thief that are the superior ones in
this world. Once understood though I find myself freed from the
need to demonstrate any false truths about immortality, decency and
justice. Not only that but I am not about to second guess god.
I had thought that it was
only a temporary thing, brought about by technological change, that
led to the delusions spread so completely in America. Now I doubt
that.
In any event one of the
truisms of systems is the systems reality becomes the only reality.
The depth of the reality however can be astounding. I have suggested
overtly and covertly that many of the American economies difficulties
have their origin long ago in the pre civil war era and it was not
for awhile until the actual motivations began to reveal themselves.
One can find it singularly
amazing how long power lasts. In the north shore of Long Island where
I lived for years there were many families that came to wealth in
providing for the civil war, over a hundred years prior. Likewise
when the two hundredth anniversary of the French revolution was
celebrated the majority of the people in charge of the festivities
where descendents not of the hoi poll oi but of the Aristocrats!
I have worn peoples ears
down complaining about that horrible day when Reagan was inaugurated,
but other, older, and perhaps wiser heads point out that the
processes that would weaken the northeast were already at world in
for instance “the southern Strategy.” The thing is I was sort of
on the cusp of event. I have been to the Carter White house but the
Senatorial office I had best connections with, Damato, did not
inspire confidence and indeed was soon removed from office.
They , and
consequently me, suffered from a universally Long Island
misconception, which is that it is the center of the world, which it
is not. Plus the kind of local politics that had in some ways
benefited the region was becoming outdated in favor of sound bites
and international issues.
Realistically though
there's no shame in admitting that in a football game the other guy
beat the hell out of you – and that's what happened to us, with the
caveat that wall street was given a free get out of jail pass.
Realistically as well, my situation was not that of the majority of
people in the region. As I've noted before nearly my entire
graduating class in high school (The honors track) moved west as soon
as possible. I had medical concerns that kept me from doing so.
For the people in the
service industries, the contractors, the restauranteurs, the plumbers
etc, there was basically little change since the owners of the
houses were staying put. I did what I could to seek out
opportunities, but there was, and presumably remains a predominantly
illicit character to business on the island. ( Note I no longer live
there.)
Churchill once again,
brings us the far eastern adage of the man riding the tigers back who
discovers that riding the tiger is one thing but getting off is quite
another thing, This is the situation the local Republicans found
themselves in the other week. I am searching for an analogy.
As a man this is the one that
comes to mind first.
A young woman marries an old
millionaire and insists she loves his sense of humor, his wisdom, his
kind kindheartedness and so on. The man discovers her cheating and
calls into effect the prenuptial agreement, which the girl
challenges.
Under testimony in
court the woman says that while she did love the hubby for his many
good qualities, actually she married him for his money.”
So now, after decades
of nonsense about the rising tide lifting all boats it's a fair cop,
as they say in the UK – the southerners are gonna whup yo ass!
& That will be the subject of the
next article
Ps who are the forgotten
generation?
Ask Micheal Moore
No comments:
Post a Comment